CIP – The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property

  • Home
  • About
    • Background
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Mission Statement
    • Staff / Members
      • Owen Dean
      • Charles Gielen
      • Sadulla Karjiker
      • Madelein Kleyn
      • Gretchen Jansen
      • Annette van Tonder
      • Christine Strauss
    • Terms and Conditions
    • IP Law Prize
  • Programmes
    • Overview
    • Master of Laws (LLM) (IP Law)
    • Postgraduate Diploma (IP Law)
    • Certificate Short Course (IP Law)
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
    • IP Public Lecture
    • World IP Day
    • Other Events
  • Research
    • Research
    • Endnote Citation Tools
  • Contact

Intellectual Property Law and How it Applies to Sport Events

In this special World IP Day article, Prof Owen Dean revisits the theme of IP rights protection for sporting events in South African law, with a focus on the developments and the Cricket World Cup 2019 as an example.    Introduction Major sports are big business and vast sums of money are involved in staging […]

Email
Posted in Ambush Marketing, Copyright, Design, IPStell, Merchandise Marks, Trade Marks Tagged ambush marketing, image rights, sport, world ip day

MaXhosa v Zara

Prof Owen Dean recently discussed the likelihood of legal action by Laduma Ngxokolo against fashion house Zara for infringement of the MaXhosa by Laduma designs. The interview with Prof Dean was broadcast on 702 radio as part of the Night Talk programme hosted by Gugulethu Mhlungu. You can listen to the interview here.   Featured image source: http://www.maxhosa.co.za/about

Email
Posted in Copyright, Design, IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged infringement, Laduma, Maxhosa, Zara

Full Stop Ahead: Public interest in blocking digital content

It makes for the perfect ideological storm when IP law and ICT law meet and the right to freedom of expression stands in the way. Capitalist and socialist, activist and pacifist, pragmatist and idealist: differing legal experts abound in the battle for, or against, IP rights in the digital environment. Two recent developments which illustrate […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged block, blocking, content, Copyright, digital, expression, freedom, geo-blocking, piracy, policy, public, public interest, rights, speech, technology, website

BEPS and Intangibles: How does it impact IP tax structures?

Intangible assets constitute a major value-driver for multi-national enterprises (MNEs). This is even more so for companies that rely on valuable intangibles rather than physical assets to generate financial returns. Intangibles such as patents, design, trademarks (or brands) and copyrights are generally easy to identify, value and transfer and as such attractive for multi-national tax […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, Design, IPStell, Patents, Plant Breeders Rights, Trade Marks Tagged export, IP, MNE, tax

IP: Politics and Beyond

“Critics of intellectual property law are apt to resort to sweeping generalisations about the unacceptable social costs of intellectual-property protection. First, as is the case with many issues concerning indigenous knowledge, these critics, who seek to undermine the property rights established by intellectual property law, often resort to making rather emotive, and sensational, claims, but […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Patents, Trade Marks Tagged Draft National Policy, Inaugural, politics

Freedom to innovate – did Government get the message?

On 27 April, Freedom Day, we will pause to mark the most significant moment in South African history and commemorate the day when freedom, above all else, became the nation’s guiding principle. The day before, World IP Day, we celebrate the achievements of our brethren that influence our every-day lives and the ability of free […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Patents, Plant Breeders Rights, Trade Marks, Traditional Knowledge Tagged amendment, Bill, Copyright, Government, patent, rights, trade marks, traditional knowledge, world ip day

No Trade Mark Protection for Rubik’s Cube Puzzle

Discussion: Court of Justice of the European Union; November 10, 2016, Case 30/15, Simba/EUIPO (full text here). ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ In this case the CJEU could further clarify how to apply the rule of European trade mark law providing that trade marks that consist exclusively of a shape or other characteristic of a product that is necessary […]

Email
Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged cube, legal, mark, protection, rubik, rubiks, shape, trade mark

What’s In A Name

In his play “Romeo and Juliet” William Shakespeare advanced the proposition through his character Juliet: “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” What he was saying was that the flower, the rose, had intrinsic value, and, no matter what name it was given, that […]

Email
Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged name, reputation, trade mark, value

Reviewed: IP Consultative Framework 2016

Summary: While the Department of Trade and Industry’s recently published Intellectual Property Consultative Framework promises that future legislation will be the result of a thorough examination of the matters of concern by experts, and stakeholders, in the field, it should also consider undoing the potential damage which may have already been done to our intellectual property […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Patents, Trade Marks

Intellectual Property and the Constitution

Section 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides that it is the supreme law of the country and that any law inconsistent with it is invalid. This provision creates the necessity to interpret the Copyright Act in a manner consistent with the Constitution at the risk of the Act, or […]

Email
Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Patents, Trade Marks Tagged bill of rights, constitution, gidani, human rights, intellectual property, laugh it off
  • « Older Entries
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Study IP Law

Keywords

Advertising Bill brand case comments Copyright copyright amendment bill culture disaster DTI enforcement expropriation Government indigenous infringement intellectual property IP IP Public Lecture Knowledge law legislation Lion Sleeps Tonight Litigation Mbube mistake Owen Dean Parliament patent Plagiarism plain packaging problem protection regulation review rights Solomon Linda sport TK tobacco trade mark trademark trademarks Traditional traditional knowledge world ip day

NOTICE

The views and opinions expressed on the CIP website are strictly those of the page author(s) and content contributor(s). The contents of the CIP website have not been reviewed or approved by Stellenbosch University.

© 2025 CIP – The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property, Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved

Terms & Conditions
Avatars by Sterling Adventures

Latest Posts

  • IP Public Lecture 2024 – Player IP: Show Me the Money!
  • Sports Law Conference 2024
  • IP Public Lecture 2023 – Gin and Tonic Anyone? Similar or Not?
  • Rationale of copyright exceptions*
  • Written submissions on Copyright Amendment Bill and Performers’ Protection Amendment Bill

The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property is an independent research unit of the Faculty of Law, Stellenbosch University. For more information visit the About page, or contact us: ipchair@sun.ac.za

Notice

The views and opinions expressed on the CIP website are strictly those of the page author(s) and content contributor(s). The contents of the CIP website have not been reviewed or approved by Stellenbosch University.

© 2025 CIP - The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property, Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved

WordPress Theme Custom Community 2 developed by Macho Themes