CIP – The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property

  • Home
  • About
    • Background
    • Intellectual Property Law
    • Mission Statement
    • Staff / Members
      • Owen Dean
      • Charles Gielen
      • Sadulla Karjiker
      • Madelein Kleyn
      • Gretchen Jansen
      • Annette van Tonder
      • Christine Strauss
    • Terms and Conditions
    • IP Law Prize
  • Programmes
    • Overview
    • Master of Laws (LLM) (IP Law)
    • Postgraduate Diploma (IP Law)
    • Certificate Short Course (IP Law)
  • News
  • Blog
  • Events
    • IP Public Lecture
    • World IP Day
    • Other Events
  • Research
    • Research
    • Endnote Citation Tools
  • Contact

IP Public Lecture 2016 – Comparative Brand Advertising

THIS EVENT IS NOW CLOSED Watch the video of the lecture below. The Chair of Intellectual Property Law presents the annual IP Law Public Lecture 2016 with Charles Webster, partner at Spoor & Fisher and frequent contributor to the intellectual property law programmes (LLM, PGDip and Short Course) at Stellenbosch University. Charles’ lecture on Comparative Brand Advertising: […]

Posted in Events, From the Chair Tagged Advertising, brand, chair, charles webster, competitive, event, free, intellectual property law, public lecture, trade mark, trademark

Keyword Advertising: The Next Instalment in the Interflora v M&S Saga

A few days after the first South African case to consider the issue of Internet keyword advertising (Cochrane Steel Products (Pty) Ltd v M-Systems Group (Pty) Ltd & Another Case 39605/13, 29 October 2014), we had the next instalment – from the English Court of Appeal – in the dispute between Interflora and Marks & […]

Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged adwords, infringement, interflora, keywords, marks, SEO, spencer, trademark

In vino veritas – Mettenheimer v Zonquasdrif Vineyards

While trade mark infringement cases are not unusual, there are few decisions in which the central issue which required determination was whether the respective goods involved were so similar that it would gave rise to a likelihood of deception or confusion.  It is for this reasonthat the decision in Mettenheimer & Another v Zonquasdrif Vineyards […]

Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged trade, trade mark, trademark, trademarks, wine

Government’s reflections on the world of Intellectual Property

INTRODUCTION Have you ever basked in the warm sunshine of a glorious summer’s day, in daydreaming mode, and allowed your mind simply to wander at random? You start with a thought, you turn it over in your mind, and then a point is reached where you go off at a tangent and muse over some […]

Posted in Copyright, Design, IPStell, Patents, Publications, Trade Marks, Traditional Knowledge Tagged Copyright, design, DTI, intellectual property, intellectual property policy, IP Policy, National IP Policy, patent, SA IP Policy, TK, trademark, traditional knowledge

News Media: Prof Dean on plain packaging

In the past three days, six articles appeared in six different national newspapers referring to Prof Dean’s landmark inaugural lecture at Stellenbosch University regarding the unconstitutional impact of Government’s proposed ban on tobacco branding on trade mark property rights. Prof Dean was also interviewed on this topic by 702 Talk radio (listen here) and 567 […]

Posted in From the Chair, Publications Tagged brand, brand value, branding, plain packaging, tobacco, trade mark, trademark

Interview: Prof Dean on Cape Talk

Prof Dean was interviewed by Kieno Kammies for 567 Cape Talk radio today (31 May 2013) on World No Tobacco Day. Prof Dean discussed why Government’s proposed ban on tobacco branding (by means of plain packaging) is unconstitutional and amounts to brand genocide. The interview relates to his inaugural address and subsequent publications. This interview […]

Posted in From the Chair, Publications Tagged brand, branding, expropriate, expropriation, genocide, plain packaging, tobacco, trade mark, trademark

Interview: Prof Dean on The Money Show

Prof Dean was interviewed by Bruce Whitfield on 702 Talk Radio for “The Money Show”. The topic of the interview was Five reasons: Why prohibiting the use of trademarks on tobacco products makes no sense.  This interview followed on the topic of Prof Dean’s inaugural address at Stellenbosch University. You can listen to the radio […]

Posted in From the Chair, Publications Tagged brand, brand value, branding, expropriate, expropriation, plain packaging, tobacco, trademark, trademarks

Brand Genocide

We all know GOOGLE. It is a facility that enables us to source information on the Internet. The word GOOGLE indicates the identity of a particular service provider and distinguishes those services from similar services rendered by others, such as YAHOO. Each service provider designates its particular services by means of such a mark. The […]

Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged brand, brand value, plain packaging, ranking, rating, tobacco, trade mark, trademark, value

A Different Ball Game

Readers will have observed from perusing the articles on this blog that I have commented on a number of occasions on the proclaimed intention of the Government to pass legislation curtailing or prohibiting the use of trade marks on tobacco products, both on their packages and in advertising.  I have expressed the view that by […]

Posted in IPStell, Trade Marks Tagged Australia, cost, deprivation, deprive, disaster, expropriation, fire, problem, property, remuneration, smoke, tobacco, trademark, trademarks

Beating About The Rooibos

It is a fact of life that attempts have been made in certain other countries to usurp control of the term or mark ROOIBOS, despite the fact that it is a well-known South African description for a particular plant which gives rise to ROOIBOS tea.  The term ROOIBOS is as typically South African as “braaivleis” […]

Posted in Copyright, IPStell, Merchandise Marks, Trade Marks, Traditional Knowledge Tagged biltong, EU, Merchandise Marks Act, rooibos, springbok, trademark, trademarks, traditional knowledge 6 Comments
  • « Older Entries
  • 1
  • 2
Study IP Law

Keywords

Advertising Bill brand case comments Copyright copyright amendment bill culture disaster DTI enforcement expropriation Government indigenous infringement intellectual property IP IP Public Lecture Knowledge law legislation Lion Sleeps Tonight Litigation Mbube mistake Owen Dean Parliament patent Plagiarism plain packaging problem protection regulation review rights Solomon Linda sport TK tobacco trade mark trademark trademarks Traditional traditional knowledge world ip day

NOTICE

The views and opinions expressed on the CIP website are strictly those of the page author(s) and content contributor(s). The contents of the CIP website have not been reviewed or approved by Stellenbosch University.

© 2025 CIP – The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property, Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved

Terms & Conditions
Avatars by Sterling Adventures

Latest Posts

  • IP Public Lecture 2024 – Player IP: Show Me the Money!
  • Sports Law Conference 2024
  • IP Public Lecture 2023 – Gin and Tonic Anyone? Similar or Not?
  • Rationale of copyright exceptions*
  • Written submissions on Copyright Amendment Bill and Performers’ Protection Amendment Bill

The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property is an independent research unit of the Faculty of Law, Stellenbosch University. For more information visit the About page, or contact us: ipchair@sun.ac.za

Notice

The views and opinions expressed on the CIP website are strictly those of the page author(s) and content contributor(s). The contents of the CIP website have not been reviewed or approved by Stellenbosch University.

© 2025 CIP - The Anton Mostert Chair of Intellectual Property, Stellenbosch University All Rights Reserved

WordPress Theme Custom Community 2 developed by Macho Themes